The Top 50
Five lists, published every month. Four of them measure one thing. The fifth puts them together.
One score, out of 100, built from four measures
A single number can only ever tell you one thing. Revenue rewards the big deal. Units reward the broker who shows up every week. Volume rewards scale. None of them is the whole picture — so from 2027 the headline list is built from all four at once , each counting for a set share of a hundred points.
How your score is worked out
Everything is measured year to date
The consolidated list runs from 1 January to the end of the reporting month. One strong month lifts you; it does not decide the year. The individual lists are published both ways — the month on its own, and the year to date.
Each measure is scored against the field
Within each of the four measures, your figure is compared with everybody else's. The strongest performer in a measure takes the full share of points for it; everyone else takes a proportion of that share, in line with where they stand.
The four scores are added together
Forty points available on revenue, thirty on units, twenty-five on volume, five on MPP. Add your four and you have a single number out of one hundred. That number is what orders the consolidated Top 50.
You can be on the list without leading anything
This is the point of it. A broker who is fifteenth on revenue, eighth on units and tenth on volume will finish ahead of someone who is third on revenue and nowhere else. Breadth beats a single spike.
A worked example
Say a broker finishes the year to date with 82% of the top performer's revenue, 91% of the top unit count, 74% of the top volume, and 60% of the top MPP count. Here is the arithmetic, in full:
| Measure | Share of the leader | Points available | Points earned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 82% | 40.0 | 32.8 |
| Units | 91% | 30.0 | 27.3 |
| Volume | 74% | 25.0 | 18.5 |
| MPP | 60% | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Total score | 100.0 | 81.6 |
Their score is 81.6 out of 100 — and notice they led nothing. That is a broker performing strongly across the whole of their business.
Why weight revenue highest?
Because it is the measure hardest to flatter. Volume moves with house prices; units move with deal size. Revenue reflects what the work was actually worth.
Why is MPP in here at all?
Because protecting a client's mortgage is part of finishing the job properly. Five points is deliberate — enough to notice, not enough to distort a ranking.
Do the individual lists still matter?
Yes. All four are published every month, for the month and year to date. If you lead a category you are named at the top of it, whatever the consolidated list says.
What if I join part-way through the year?
You are scored on what you have funded so far, like everyone else. The year-to-date basis means the list settles as the year goes on rather than swinging month to month.
The consolidated Top 50
All four measures, year to date, scored out of 100.
| # | Broker | Score | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
96.4 | |
| 2 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
88.1 | |
| 3 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
81.6 |
… through to 50
The four lists
Each published for the month on its own and for the year to date.
| # | Broker | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
$000,000 |
| 2 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
$000,000 |
| 3 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
$000,000 |
… through to 50
| # | Broker | Units funded |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
00 |
| 2 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
00 |
| 3 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
00 |
… through to 50
| # | Broker | Volume funded |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
$00,000,000 |
| 2 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
$00,000,000 |
| 3 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
$00,000,000 |
… through to 50
| # | Broker | Policies placed |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
00 |
| 2 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
00 |
| 3 | Sample Broker
Sample network
|
00 |
… through to 50



